Marie winn television the plug in drug essay

But by this comforting trend had been reversed. The British psychiatrist D. It seems likely that before they succumbed to television, their verbal and analytic abilities had been sharpened and deepened by extensive reading.

Quotes from reviews of The Plug-In Drug: The fact that the verbal scores went down far more than the math scores lends support to the theory that TV was a causal factor. To help parents and families with this task is the purpose of this book. Year after year the number of students scoring in the to range on the Verbal SATs dropped steadily, going frominto fewer than 72, ina decrease of more than a third.

Juxtaposing the SAT scores of high school students during the last 40 or so years with some statistics about TV ownership and viewing times during those years, may help to answer all three of these questions. What brought about this troubling decline? The latest research coupled with candid and inspiring correspondence from actual families make this the best edition yet.

Inwhen the scores had almost reached their nadir, a panel commissioned by the College Board concluded that a major factor for the lower scores was the greater diversity of students taking the test — more minority students, some of them not native speakers of English, were now striving to get into college.

One study indicates that first- and sixth-graders the two groups chosen for that particular study were watching about an hour more television daily in than inand that Sunday viewing had increased by more than two and a half hours for the sixth-graders.

At least partly because the saturation point had been reached around Why the decrease in high scores? And as the previous section indicates, numerous studies have shown a strong negative association between television viewing and school performance.

They have stayed at about the same level ever since. This refreshingly candid and inviting study is highly recommended for both public and academic libraries. As these brightest students watched more TV, their college board scores began to decline. Others are a total mess.

Why did it begin just when it did? For many families, how they control television may decisively influence whether they go in one direction or another. Though excessive television watching is a common symptom of family pathology, these families are not likely to find that watching less TV is going to make much difference in their lives.

As more of these students replaced books with TV viewing, their scores decreased dramatically. So sixteen years later the scores bottomed out. Every year through the sixties and seventies, thanks to the increase in set ownership, a larger cohort of TV watchers took their SATs, and every year, the scores went down, down, down: People have been trying to find the answer to these questions for years.

Although Winn pinpoints many key shortcomings of television, this study is not argumentative; Winn instead aims to stress the quality of family life without television, to show educators and parents how to control the medium, and to offer practical suggestions on how to improve family life not dependent on television.

They have too many other basic problems to deal with first.

And then somewhere between the heights and depths are most of the rest of us. Others have suggested less effective teaching in the schools. And the decline leveled off as well. Some seem to be spectacularly successful. And even if it turned out that only reading and language arts teaching had fallen off, while good teaching, for some reason, had managed to prevail for math, it still would not explain why the decline leveled out after a number of years.

Another suggestive pattern emerges when noting the decrease is characterized by changes in the two extremes—fewer high scores and more low scores—rather than an across-the-board slippage. Their family life is rich and satisfying.Throughout the essay, Marie Winn attempts to back up her argument that the cultural addiction to television has diminished family unity.

She uses testimonies from parents, therapists, teachers, and writers to help support her claims. The Plug-In Drug by Marie Winn Essay Words | 3 Pages. In an article ' The Plug-In Drug ' the author Marie Winn discusses the bad influence of television on today's society.

Television is a ' drug ' that interfere with family ritual, destroys human relationships and undermines the family. The Plug-In Drug Marie Winn Background Organization Analysis Purpose Understanding Application Structure Main Ideas Rhetoric Winn structures her essay in short sections separated by titles in order to convey complex thoughts without lumping ideas together.

In an article ' The Plug-In Drug ' the author Marie Winn discusses the bad influence of television on today's society. Television is a ' drug ' that interfere with family ritual, destroys human relationships and undermines the family. Television: The Plug-In Drug In Television: The Plug-In Drug, Marie Winn describes the unanticipated effects of televisions on families.

After the introduction of the television, it was predicted that the medium would, in fact, be a. MARIE WINN Television: The Plug-In Drug Marie Winn was bona in in Prague, in what is now the Czech Republic, and raised in New York City. She is an author and a transla- tor of Czech writers such as Vaclav Havel, playwright and president of the Czech Republic (—).

The Plug-In Drug: Television.

Marie winn television the plug in drug essay
Rated 4/5 based on 21 review